Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts

Sunday, February 28, 2016

MARCO RUBIO BACKED BY THE CORRUPT GOP ESTABLISHMENT LOBBYIST OWNED AND OPERATED SPECIAL INTEREST

WHO OWNS MARCO RUBIO 

Please Share This ! 

Marco Rubio = Is Now The Corrupt GOP Establishments Mouthpiece! Owned And Run By Lobbyist And Special Interest Groups "UNWANTED "

Marco Rubio Picks Up ‘Establishment’ Backers as GOP Field Narrows He Is Selling His Goods ! This Is Not What We Need, Hes just a Latino Obama!

Sen. Marco Rubio is greeted by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley before addressing supporters at a primary night event Feb. 20, 2016 in Columbia, S.C.

Norm Coleman is free Thursday after all. The former Republican senator from Minnesota was supposed to co-host a fundraiser forJeb Bush, but the former Florida governor on Saturday gave up his bid for the GOP nomination after a limp finish in the South Carolina primary.  Now Mr. Coleman – who originally backed South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham before he quit the race in December — is throwing his support to Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.
Virginia Republican fundraiser Bobbie Kilberg, who joined Mr. Bush’s camp last week, said nine donors reached out Sunday morning to say that if she backed Mr. Rubio, they would, too
“That’s a lot of people to call you at 10 in the morning on a Sunday,” said Mrs. Kilberg, who originally backed New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s now-defunct presidential campaign. “I really believe (Mr. Rubio) is the only candidate around which mainstream Republicans can coalesce in order to win this nomination and win the general election.”
It’s the presidential version of musical chairs, as one candidate after another no longer sees a path to the nomination, goes home and leaves rivals jockeying for their cushion, so to speak.
Mr. Coleman and Mrs. Kilberg are among the first wave of major donors, elected officials and party leaders who are gravitating to Mr. Rubio after Mr. Bush’s exit. Despite his resistance to being lumped with the Republican “establishment,” Mr. Rubio is emerging as that wing of the party’s top choice.
These Republicans view New York billionaire Donald Trump and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz as too extreme to win a general election, and they’re skeptical Ohio Gov. John Kasich and retired neurosurgeonBen Carson can win the nomination.
In Mr. Rubio, who narrowly edged out Mr. Cruz for second place in South Carolina, “Republicans got what they wanted and needed — a proven, experienced, and electable political leader to emerge as an alternative to Trump,” said Fred Malek, a major Republican donor who has not endorsed a candidate because of his fundraising duties for the Republican Governors Association. “Sen. Rubio has proven the ability to bring people together across the spectrum, not just on the far right.”
Mr. Rubio’s campaign said he picked up support from at least four other prominent donors, including former ambassador Francis Rooney, who donated $2.3 million through his company last year to the pro-Bush super PAC, and Chicago investor Muneer Satter, who gave $550,000 to that super PAC. Other new donors include coal billionaire Joe Craft and former ambassador and Florida developerJohn Rood.
But some donors are taking a wait-and-see attitude toward Mr. Rubio, said Walker Stapleton, the Colorado state treasurer who was co-chairman of the Bush campaign in Colorado.
“While Rubio has performed better than Jeb has in these early states, the question remains can he actually win a state,” Mr. Stapleton said Sunday. “From an investment perspective you don’t know if it’s worth it.”
Another top supporter of Mr. Bush, Texas donor Fred Zeidman, said, “I need to catch my breath and see who can beat (Democrat)Hillary Clinton. That’s the only goal.”
Endorsements from elected officials behind Mr. Bush are also starting to roll in for Mr. Rubio.  Nevada Sen. Dean Heller and Rep.Mark Amodei switched teams Sunday, two days before that state’s Republican caucus.
On Monday, three current and one former members of Congress from Miami who had been backing Mr. Bush – Republicans Carlos CurbeloIleana Ros-LehtinenMario Diaz-Balart and Lincoln Diaz-Balart, are expected to throw their support to Mr. Rubio.
Also on Monday, Mr. Cruz is expecting to pick up an endorsement from one Bush fundraiser with long time ties to the Bush family, C. Boyden Gray, who was White House counsel to Mr. Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush.


Monday, February 22, 2016

GOP ESTABLISHMENT PUSHING RUBIO The Establishment Isn’t Resigned to Donal Trump Yet

The GOP Establishment
 Still pushing anyone but trump,the establishment candidate has  become rubio! Rubio now has all the big money backers,all trying to buy a piece of influence , thats the problem with a establishment candidate,they owe the donors and do not stand and fight for the conservatives who elected them! The GOP Establishment has repeatedly failed to stand their ground on the issues, they cave to the liberal agenda, always failing to prevent the liberal agenda from going forward!



160125_POL_Trump


Over the past week or so, a belief has begun to gain real traction that the Republican Party “establishment” has warmed to the possibility of Donald Trump as its presidential nominee. This is predicated on the scenario that the nomination comes down to Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz, whom Republican leaders personally dislike and consider unelectable to boot.

A central figure in the Trump-acceptance movement is former presidential nominee and Senate majority leader Bob Dole, the erstwhile Republican establishment standard-bearer who is now just another elderly person in Kansas. Dole, the New York Times reports, warned of “cataclysmic” and “wholesale losses” if Cruz wins the nomination. Trump, by contrast, could stop Cruz, and if he wins the general election, could “probably work with Congress, because he’s, you know, he’s got the right personality and he’s kind of a deal-maker.”
nomination. Trump, by contrast, could stop Cruz, and if he wins the general election, could “probably work with Congress, because he’s, you know, he’s got the right personality and he’s kind of a deal-maker.”
Is this really how they feel? Or is it just a means of stopping the immediate problem: an Iowa victory for Cruz, who led the state’s polling just long enough to solidify the conventional wisdom that he needs to win it?
To me, this is very likely a feint from establishment Republicans for one important reason: They don’t directly address Trump’s electability, which, like Cruz’s, remains poor. General-election–matchup polling this early comes with many caveats—the fact that the general-election campaign is still six months away, notably. And we should expect that the instant Trump were to win the nomination, he would move to rebrand himself as a lifelong pro-choice feminist Latino. But those early matchup numbers are still awful—and worse than Cruz’s—because Trump has gone to great lengths to viscerally alienate so many demographic groups and has certain ... let’s say, temperament issues.
It may be that members of the Republican establishment, in their trolling of Cruz, don’t address Trump’s own electability because they recognize it for what it is. “Of course, this willingness to accommodate Mr. Trump is driven in part by the fact that few among the Republican professional class believe he would win a general election,” the New York Times reported in a separate piece about the establishment’s supposed détente with the mogul. “In their minds it would be better to effectively rent the party to Mr. Trump for four months this fall, through the general election, than risk turning it over to Mr. Cruz for at least four years, as either the president or the next-in-line leader for the 2020 nomination.”
There’s the tell. Are we really to think that the Republican Party establishment has already come to terms with losing this election? The purpose of the Republican Party establishment is not primarily ideological; it is to win elections for the Republican Party so that the Republican Party will have more ability to do the bidding of the interest groups that prop it up. If the establishment was already prepared to lose the election, they’d be better off going with Cruz to at least scratch the conservative movement’s itch for one of their own as the nominee in order to prove that this path won’t actually work.
In reality, the Republican establishment wants to win this election. I don’t want to give GOP elites too much credit now, given how incompetently they’ve managed the cycle so far, but it looks like they’re making an honest-to-goodness “play” here. Some might even call it a “strategy.” The most appropriate term, though, would be “moonshot.”
Their first objective is to take out Cruz. That means stopping him in Iowa. If he loses Iowa, a narrative sets in about how he blew it, and he might then finish out of the top three in New Hampshire. From there, he would likely not be able to make the dominant sweep through the South over the next month that his delegate strategy requires. If we look at Cruz’s Iowa trend line over the past week as he’s been taking incoming fire from all sides, it seems that this part of the plan is working.
The second objective, and a much longer-term one, is to take out Trump. Trump’s Iowa win would likely ice his New Hampshire victory. But if Cruz’s Iowa loss takes him out of the running for second place in New Hampshire, that silver medal would likely go to Sen. Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Gov. John Kasich, or Gov. Chris Christie. Rubio would seem to have the edge following a likely third-place Iowa finish that Bush’s super PAC has been trying so hard to deny him. And if Rubio finished second in New Hampshire, the other three establishment-acceptable candidates who’ve pinned their hopes on New Hampshire would face overwhelming pressure to drop out. Rubio consolidates that voting bloc, holds his water against Trump through the South, scoops up the larger, more moderate winner-take-all states beginning March 15, becomes the nominee, and crushes Hillary Clinton by a trillion electoral votes.
Do you spot the flaw? It is found in the screaming disconnect between these two ideas: We are talking about a strategy that cedes Trump the long sought Iowa–New Hampshire double and a dozen or so additional states over the course of a month …and then bets on Trump losing the nomination. And losing it, at that, to someone like Rubio or Bush. Does the Republican establishment, after seeing all that it’s seen so far this cycle, still operate under the impression that Trump would lose in a head-to-head matchup to either Rubio or Bush, something directly contradicted by recent polling?

Saturday, March 15, 2014

"NEW" Conservative Women’s Group Formed To Counter ‘War On Women’ Narrative


Red State Women

----------------------------------

(Breitbart)
A new group, Red State Women, launched this week in response to efforts by leftist groups, such as Battleground Texas, to turn the Texas blue after protracted efforts to use abortion as a wedge issue against conservatives.
The new Republican group, led by Cari Christman, is resolved to offer a firm voice for conservative women in Texas—despite “War on Women” rhetoric.
State Sen. Wendy Davis' filibuster against the 20 week abortion ban, along with her constant push to appeal to Texas women, is what ultimately inspired Christman to form her new group. Chistman told Breitbart Texas, "When Davis gave the controversial filibuster on abortion, Republican women said, 'Senator Davis does not speak for me. I disagree with her.' So I began thinking, how do we convey this message collectively?"




------------------------------------------------------------------


WHY YOU SHOULD LOBBY CONGRESS 
Citizens may feel it is a waste of time to contact elected leaders, because their minds are made up already. But on most issues, legislators try hard to determine the desires and leanings of their constituency before they vote. Politicians worry about being re-elected, and know that the happier their constituency, the more likely their own re-election.
Contact Your Members Of Congress On This Issue! Tell your members Of Congress That Its Time To End The Illegal Actions Of The Obama Admin & Other Government Agencies!

To contact Congress On this issue click on your state link to find & contact your members of Congress
US Government
US Senate
US House
State/Federal Candidates
Members of Congress
Bills & Resolutions

Bills & Resolutions
Voting Records
National Weather
Maps
Report Illegals & Employers
Military

CONTACT THE
 PRESIDENT
CONTACT THE VICE 
PRESIDENT
SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
SENATE MINORITY LEADER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER


Thursday, February 20, 2014

Ted Cruz to Address Hollywood's Secret Conservative Group



WHY YOU SHOULD LOBBY CONGRESS 
Citizens may feel it is a waste of time to contact elected leaders, because their minds are made up already. But on most issues, legislators try hard to determine the desires and leanings of their constituency before they vote. Politicians worry about being re-elected, and know that the happier their constituency, the more likely their own re-election.
Contact Your Members Of Congress On This Issue! Tell your members Of Congress That Its Time To End The Illegal Actions Of The Obama Admin & Other Government Agencies!

To contact Congress On this issue click on your state link to find & contact your members of Congress
US Government
US Senate
US House
State/Federal Candidates
Members of Congress
Bills & Resolutions

Bills & Resolutions
Voting Records
National Weather
Maps
Report Illegals & Employers
Military

CONTACT THE
 PRESIDENT
CONTACT THE VICE 
PRESIDENT
SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
SENATE MINORITY LEADER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER





Ted Cruz to Address Hollywood's Secret Conservative Group Friends of Abe (Exclusive)
The group rightly refused a request from the IRS to reveal the names of its members, says the Republican senator from Texas; "FOA should respond to the IRS as it would to any McCarthyite request for information."
By Paul Bond, The Hollywood Reporter

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz will visit Hollywood's not-so-secret group of conservatives called Friends of Abe next month, and he tells The Hollywood Reporter he will address what he considers is a government effort to intimidate artists who criticize President Barack Obama and his policies.

FOA, a group of about 2,000 entertainment industry workers, likes to remain under the radar. But The New York Times on Jan. 22 revealed the group's two-year-long effort to be recognized as a tax-free charity organization. One thing the IRS has wanted from FOA is its membership list, and Cruz says the group has been right to refuse such a request, which he says stems from "an abuse of power."

Friday, January 17, 2014

"IRS" Democrats are working hard to make sure conservative groups are silenced in the 2014 midterms.

Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!

WHY YOU SHOULD LOBBY CONGRESS 
Citizens may feel it is a waste of time to contact elected leaders, because their minds are made up already. But on most issues, legislators try hard to determine the desires and leanings of their constituency before they vote. Politicians worry about being re-elected, and know that the happier their constituency, the more likely their own re-election.
Contact Your Members Of Congress On This Issue! Tell your members Of Congress That Its Time To End The Illegal Actions Of The Obama Admin & Other Government Agencies!

To contact Congress On this issue click on your state link to find & contact your members of Congress
US Government
US Senate
US House
State/Federal Candidates
Members of Congress
Bills & Resolutions

Bills & Resolutions
Voting Records
National Weather
Maps
Report Illegals & Employers
Military

CONTACT THE
 PRESIDENT
CONTACT THE VICE 
PRESIDENT
SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
SENATE MINORITY LEADER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

President Obama and Democrats have been at great pains to insist they knew nothing about IRS targeting of conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofits before the 2012 election. They've been at even greater pains this week to ensure that the same conservative groups are silenced in the 2014 midterms.
That's the big, dirty secret of the omnibus negotiations. As one of the only bills destined to pass this year, the omnibus was—behind the scenes—a flurry of horse trading. One of the biggest fights was over GOP efforts to include language to stop the IRS from instituting a new round of 501(c)(4) targeting. The White House is so counting on the tax agency to muzzle its political opponents that it willingly sacrificed any manner of its own priorities to keep the muzzle in place.
And now back to our previously scheduled outrage over the Chris Christie administration's abuse of traffic cones on the George Washington Bridge.
The fight was sparked by a new rule that the Treasury Department and the IRS introduced during the hush of Thanksgiving recess, ostensibly to "improve" the law governing nonprofits. What the rule in fact does is recategorize as "political" all manner of educational activities that 501(c)(4) social-welfare organizations currently engage in.
It's IRS targeting all over again, only this time by administration design and with the raw political goal—as House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R., Mich.) notes—of putting "tea party groups out of business."
Congressional sources tell me that House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R., Ky.) had two priorities in the omnibus negotiations. One was getting in protection for groups that morally oppose ObamaCare's contraception-coverage requirement. The other was language that would put a hold on the IRS rule.
The White House and Senate Democrats had their own wish list, including an increase in funding for the International Monetary Fund, the president's prekindergarten program and more ObamaCare dollars.
Yet my sources say that throughout the negotiations Democrats went all in on keeping the IRS rule, even though it meant losing their own priorities. In the final hours before the omnibus was introduced Monday night, the administration made a last push for IMF money. Asked to negotiate that demand in the context of new IRS language, it refused.
That's a lot to sacrifice for a rule that the administration has barely noted in public, and that then-acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel claimed last fall when it was introduced is simply about providing "clarity" to nonprofits. It only makes sense in a purely political context. The president's approval ratings are in the toilet, the economy is in idle, theObamaCare debate rages on, and the White House has a Senate majority to preserve. With one little IRS rule it can shut up hundreds of groups that pose a direct threat by restricting their ability to speak freely in an election season about spending or ObamaCare or jobs. And it gets away with it by positioning this new targeting as a fix for the first round.
This week's Democratic rally-round further highlights the intensely political nature of their IRS rule. It was quietly dropped in the runup to the holiday season, to minimize the likelihood of an organized protest during its comment period. That 90-day comment period meantime ends on Feb. 27, positioning the administration to shut down conservative groups early in this election cycle.
Mr. Camp's committee has meanwhile noted that Treasury appears to have reverse-engineered the carefully tailored rule—combing through the list of previously targeted tea party groups, compiling a list of their main activities and then restricting those functions.
And an IRS rule that purports to—as Mr. Werfel explained—"improve our work in the tax-exempt area" completely ignores the biggest of political players in the tax-exempt area: unions. The guidance is directed only at 501(c)(4) social-welfare groups—the tax category that has of late been flooded by conservative groups. Mr. Obama's union foot soldiers—which file under 501(c)(5)—can continue playing in politics.
Treasury is also going to great lengths to keep secret the process behind its rule. Cleta Mitchell, an attorney who represents targeted tea party groups, in early December filed a Freedom of Information Act request with Treasury and the IRS, demanding documents or correspondence with the White House or outside groups in the formulation of this rule. By law, the government has 30 days to respond. Treasury sent a letter to Ms. Mitchell this week saying it wouldn't have her documents until April—after the rule's comment period closes. It added that if she didn't like it, she can "file suit." The IRS has yet to respond.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

"TED CRUZ" THE TRUE CONSERVATIVE PATRIOT "SHOULD BE VOTED CONSERVATIVE OF THE YEAR"

Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!

WHY YOU SHOULD LOBBY CONGRESS 
Citizens may feel it is a waste of time to contact elected leaders, because their minds are made up already. But on most issues, legislators try hard to determine the desires and leanings of their constituency before they vote. Politicians worry about being re-elected, and know that the happier their constituency, the more likely their own re-election.
Contact Your Members Of Congress On This Issue! Tell your members Of Congress That Its Time To End The Illegal Actions Of The Obama Admin & Other Government Agencies!

To contact Congress On this issue click on your state link to find & contact your members of Congress
US Government
US Senate
US House
State/Federal Candidates
Members of Congress
Bills & Resolutions

Bills & Resolutions
Voting Records
National Weather
Maps
Report Illegals & Employers
Military

CONTACT THE
 PRESIDENT
CONTACT THE VICE 
PRESIDENT
SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
SENATE MINORITY LEADER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER


"TED CRUZ" THE TRUE CONSERVATIVE PATRIOT "SHOULD BE VOTED CONSERVATIVE OF THE YEAR" TED CRUZ STOOD AGAINST "GOP RINO'S" WHO IN THE END VOTED FOR OBAMACARE & PASSED A BUDGET THAT FULLY FUNDS EVERY ONE OF OBAMA'S LIBERAL SPENDING PROJECTS !  HE STOOD WITH THE TEAPARTY AGAINST THOSE REPUBLICANS WHO WOULD SELL OUT CONSERVATIVE VALUES "FOR A FEW LIBERAL VOTES" WE MUST SUPPORT TED CRUZ & THE TEAPARTY IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE LIBERAL SOCIALIST AGENDA! 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: Todd Gillman (Dallas Morning News)
Ted Cruz sure knows how to make a first impression. No freshman in U.S. Senate history has kicked up quite so much dust or proved so polarizing.
He’s established himself as a formidable adversary to Democrats and to leaders of his own party. Through force of intellect and stamina, he brought the Senate and then the federal government to a standstill.
He ends his maiden year in the Senate beloved and shunned. He is unrepentant about tactics that have alienated colleagues and, if anything, emboldened to keep prodding Republicans ever rightward — and away from timid incrementalism.
“To some extent, involuntarily and often kicking and screaming, D.C. has been forced to listen to the American people,” he said during an hourlong interview in his Senate office. “The biggest thing I have learned is the incredible power of the grass roots — the ability of the American people to change the way business is done in Washington.”
For Cruz, a 43-year-old who is impatient with the old order, that has meant taking an unconventional approach.
Shaking up Washington requires finding its pressure points, and for elected officials, pressure comes from constituents. So instead of focusing on backroom deal-making or waiting for seniority to accrue, Cruz has devoted his energy to rallying the public, leveraging grassroots passion.
He all but sneers at leaders in his own party, who recently unleashed months of pent-up frustration with tea partiers.
House Speaker John Boehner cut a budget deal with Democrats that left that faction isolated, proclaiming he doesn’t care what tea party leaders want anymore. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, facing a stiff tea party challenge in the Kentucky primary, called the Senate Conservatives Fund — a group closely allied with Cruz — a bully that deserves a punch in the nose.
“The Washington establishment does not like change,” Cruz said, “and no one should be surprised when the Washington establishment pushes back hard against changing the culture in Congress that has led to out-of-control spending, debt and taxes.”
While Republicans have a strong chance to regain the Senate majority in 2014 elections, he added, “The easiest way the Republican Party can mess it up in 2014 is if the party bosses focus more on attacking conservatives, on attacking the tea party, than on making the case to the American people [that] there is a better way than the Obama economic agenda.”
Applied to McConnell, “party boss” isn’t a term of endearment.
Nothing illustrates the uneasy relationship better than Cruz’s role, on paper, with the party’s Senate campaign arm...

A9

The Teaparty Lobby
"Join Your State Group Today"

We Ask For Your Support In Defeating The liberal , Socialist Democrats In 2014 ! Join The Fight ! Join Or Start A Teaparty Group !
Visit & Join One Or All Of Our Facebook State Groups, Post On Our Groups Wall !
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California
Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia
Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey
New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio
Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont
Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Dist. of Columbia