GOP PARTY ELITE DONORS BEHIND THE EFFORT TO PREVENT TRUMPS NOMINATION

DESPERATION BEHIND THE LIES TED CRUZ AND MARCO RUBIO ARE SPREADING ABOUT DONALD TRUMP! GOP PARTY ELITE MILLIONAIRE DONORS  CORRUPTION BEHIND THE EFFORT TO PREVENT TRUMPS NOMINATION , BIG MONEY DONORS AND LOBBYIST FEAR THEY WILL LOSE THEIR INFLUENCE OVER THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT IF TRUMP BECOMES THE NOMINEE! TED CRUZ AND MARCO RUBIO FEAR THEY WILL HAVE NO INFLUENCE TO SELL IF TRUMP WINS THE NOMINATION!
YOU HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHY THE PARTY ELITE ARE AGAINST THE PEOPLES CHOICE,TRUMP SUPPORTERS ARE TRUE CONSERVATIVES,  THE GOP ESTABLISHMENT ELITE "THEY ARE THEY ONES WHO HAS BETRAYED TRUE CONSERVATIVES ,THEY ARE THEY ONES WHO HAVE ALLOWED THE DEMOCRATS TO DOMINATE EVERY ISSUE, THEY ARE THE REASON WE SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP!  WE ARE SICK OF THE CORRUPTION, SICK OF THE ESTABLISHMENT SELLING OUT AND BETRAYING CONSERVATIVES,FAILING TO STAND THEIR GROUND AND FIGHT TO WIN ON CONSERVATIVE ISSUES AND CAUSES! IF YOU WANT A REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT WINS, IF YOU WANT TO ADVANCE CONSERVATISM, IF YOU WANT TO WIN ON CONSERVATIVE ISSUES  "THEN YOU MUST SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP"

VIDEO

How The Elite Plan To Steal The Election From Trump

Published on Jan 12, 2016

author and political strategist Roger Stone breaks down polls which show Democrats are defecting to the GOP and that Donald Trump would win in a general election.
http://www.rogerstone.com/
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/01/bil...
http://www.examiner.com/article/donal...

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

Follow Alex on TWITTER - https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Like Alex on FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme...
Infowars on G+ - https://plus.google.com/+infowars/

Super PAC pitches GOP donors on plan to stop Trump

Washington (CNN)Katie Packer, the Republican operative leading the anti-Donald Trump super PAC, 

Pitched her strategy to stop the Republican front-runner on a call with more than 50 GOP donors and power brokers Tuesday, including those with ties to the campaigns of Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Scott Walker and Chris Christie.

Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman, who was Chris Christie's national finance co-chair, and Brian Baker, a Republican operative connected to the Ricketts family, both spoke on the call, sources who were on the call told CNN.

READ: HP chief Meg Whitman calls Trump 'unfit to be president'

It came on Super Tuesday, as Trump prepared to build on his lead -- and Republican loyalists increasingly fretted the prospect that Trump will run away with the nomination.

Packer, a veteran of Mitt Romney's 2012 campaign who launched Our Principles PAC, told CNN that "it concerns me" that Super Tuesday's results might not make her task any easier by knocking any Republicans out of the field.

But, she added, "if the worst-case scenario is we have to take it all the way to the convention, that's fine by me."

Still, it's not clear that establishment Republicans have settled on a single strategy to defeat Trump -- a reality Packer acknowledged.

"The question is, do people feel like that's best executed by giving to a campaign that they're invested in or another candidate's super PAC or our effort?" Packer said. "We're not particularly greedy about it coming to our effort, although we have had a lot of enthusiasm for our effort."

Packer argued that Trump has not faced a sustained negative advertising campaign. She pointed out that so far, of the $215 million spent on the air in the GOP race, only $9 million has been funneled into attack ads against Trump -- less than the $10 million Romney's campaign spent in a single week in a single state, Florida, to undercut Newt Gingrich in 2012.

"The reality is that there has been no sustained campaign against this guy until last Thursday," she said.

The new push comes after the group aired ads against Trump in Iowa, but couldn't raise money to continue after Trump's second-place finish there.

Packer's super PAC also ramped up its efforts this week by hiring ex-Jeb Bush campaign aide Tim Miller as its communications director.

The group is already on the air nationally with an ad that launched Tuesday blasting "Trump University." It's airing on CNN and Fox News, as well as more broadly in Florida, Illinois and Michigan -- three key states that vote later this month.

The attacks on Trump could sound like the 2012 hits on Romney's work at Bain Capital.

Previewing her line of attack against Trump, Packer said: "This guy isn't a conservative. He probably isn't even a Republican. He is a con man who is incredibly vulnerable in the general election once Democrats get their hands on him."
THIS IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY !
THE PARTY ELITE HAVE NO RESPECT FOR CONSERVATIVE VOTERS!

THESE LINKS DEMONSTRATE THE DESPERATION OF THE CORRUPT PARTY ELITE!

1. Super Pac Donors

   Ask.com/Super Pac Donors

   Explore Ask.com Today. Super Pac Donors, Quality Questions; Fast Reliable Answers from Across the Web.

1. GOP donors get behind anti-Trump super PAC - Business Insider

   www.businessinsider.com/gop-donors-super-pac-donald-trump...

   Top Republican donors are throwing money at the Donald Trump ... were among those said to be organizing support behind an anti-Trump super PAC. ...

2. Super PAC pitches GOP donors on plan to stop Donald Trump

   www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/republican-donald-trump...

   Washington (CNN)Katie Packer, the Republican operative leading the anti-Donald Trump superPAC, pitched her strategy to stop the Republican front-runner on ...

3. Anti Trump Super Pac Donors List News

   • Cracks in GOP Opposition to Trump Emerge

     NBC NEWS6 days ago

   • How the DNC Shielded Clinton From the Same Fate as Jeb Bush

     The New York Observer21 hours ago

   • By Iowa, Huckabee bid on fumes, going into red

     Arkansas Democrat-Gazette5 days ago

   More Anti Trump Super Pac Donors List Headlines

4. Anti-Trump Donor Revealed: Who Is The Person Funding the Anti ...

   www.inquisitr.com/2815500/anti-trump-donor-revealed-anti...

   February 21, 2016 Anti-Trump Donor Revealed: Who Is The Person Funding the Anti-TrumpSuper PAC?

5. Anti-Trump super PAC adds top Bush adviser - politico.com

   www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and...

   Anti-Trump super PAC adds top Bush adviser. By Alex Isenstadt. ... Organizers, hoping to fill the super PAC’s coffers, briefed donors on the group’s ...

6. Major GOP donors are finally getting behind an anti-Trump ...

   finance.yahoo.com/news/major-gop-donors-finally-getting...

   ... Top Republican donors are throwing money at the Donald Trump ... among those said to be organizing support behind an anti-Trump super PAC. ...

GOP ESTABLISHMENT PUSHING RUBIO The Establishment Isn’t Resigned to Donal Trump Yet

The GOP Establishment  Still pushing anyone but trump,the establishment candidate has  become rubio! Rubio now has all the big money backers,all trying to buy a piece of influence , thats the problem with a establishment candidate,they owe the donors and do not stand and fight for the conservatives who elected them! The GOP Establishment has repeatedly failed to stand their ground on the issues, they cave to the liberal agenda, always failing to prevent the liberal agenda from going forward!

Over the past week or so, a belief has begun to gain real traction that the Republican Party “establishment” has warmed to the possibility of Donald Trump as its presidential nominee. This is predicated on the scenario that the nomination comes down to Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz, whom Republican leaders personally dislike and consider unelectable to boot.

A central figure in the Trump-acceptance movement is former presidential nominee and Senate majority leader Bob Dole, the erstwhile Republican establishment standard-bearer who is now just another elderly person in Kansas. Dole, the New York Times reports, warned of “cataclysmic” and “wholesale losses” if Cruz wins the nomination. Trump, by contrast, could stop Cruz, and if he wins the general election, could “probably work with Congress, because he’s, you know, he’s got the right personality and he’s kind of a deal-maker.”

nomination. Trump, by contrast, could stop Cruz, and if he wins the general election, could “probably work with Congress, because he’s, you know, he’s got the right personality and he’s kind of a deal-maker.”

Is this really how they feel? Or is it just a means of stopping the immediate problem: an Iowa victory for Cruz, who led the state’s polling just long enough to solidify the conventional wisdom that he needs to win it?

To me, this is very likely a feint from establishment Republicans for one important reason: They don’t directly address Trump’s electability, which, like Cruz’s, remains poor. General-election–matchup polling this early comes with many caveats—the fact that the general-election campaign is still six months away, notably. And we should expect that the instant Trump were to win the nomination, he would move to rebrand himself as a lifelong pro-choice feminist Latino. But those early matchup numbers are still awful—and worse than Cruz’s—because Trump has gone to great lengths to viscerally alienate so many demographic groups and has certain ... let’s say, temperament issues.

It may be that members of the Republican establishment, in their trolling of Cruz, don’t address Trump’s own electability because they recognize it for what it is. “Of course, this willingness to accommodate Mr. Trump is driven in part by the fact that few among the Republican professional class believe he would win a general election,” the New York Times reported in a separate piece about the establishment’s supposed détente with the mogul. “In their minds it would be better to effectively rent the party to Mr. Trump for four months this fall, through the general election, than risk turning it over to Mr. Cruz for at least four years, as either the president or the next-in-line leader for the 2020 nomination.”

There’s the tell. Are we really to think that the Republican Party establishment has already come to terms with losing this election? The purpose of the Republican Party establishment is not primarily ideological; it is to win elections for the Republican Party so that the Republican Party will have more ability to do the bidding of the interest groups that prop it up. If the establishment was already prepared to lose the election, they’d be better off going with Cruz to at least scratch the conservative movement’s itch for one of their own as the nominee in order to prove that this path won’t actually work.

In reality, the Republican establishment wants to win this election. I don’t want to give GOP elites too much credit now, given how incompetently they’ve managed the cycle so far, but it looks like they’re making an honest-to-goodness “play” here. Some might even call it a “strategy.” The most appropriate term, though, would be “moonshot.”

Their first objective is to take out Cruz. That means stopping him in Iowa. If he loses Iowa, a narrative sets in about how he blew it, and he might then finish out of the top three in New Hampshire. From there, he would likely not be able to make the dominant sweep through the South over the next month that his delegate strategy requires. If we look at Cruz’s Iowa trend line over the past week as he’s been taking incoming fire from all sides, it seems that this part of the plan is working.

The second objective, and a much longer-term one, is to take out Trump. Trump’s Iowa win would likely ice his New Hampshire victory. But if Cruz’s Iowa loss takes him out of the running for second place in New Hampshire, that silver medal would likely go to Sen. Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Gov. John Kasich, or Gov. Chris Christie. Rubio would seem to have the edge following a likely third-place Iowa finish that Bush’s super PAC has been trying so hard to deny him. And if Rubio finished second in New Hampshire, the other three establishment-acceptable candidates who’ve pinned their hopes on New Hampshire would face overwhelming pressure to drop out. Rubio consolidates that voting bloc, holds his water against Trump through the South, scoops up the larger, more moderate winner-take-all states beginning March 15, becomes the nominee, and crushes Hillary Clinton by a trillion electoral votes.

Do you spot the flaw? It is found in the screaming disconnect between these two ideas: We are talking about a strategy that cedes Trump the long sought Iowa–New Hampshire double and a dozen or so additional states over the course of a month …and then bets on Trump losing the nomination. And losing it, at that, to someone like Rubio or Bush. Does the Republican establishment, after seeing all that it’s seen so far this cycle, still operate under the impression that Trump would lose in a head-to-head matchup to either Rubio or Bush, something directly contradicted by recent polling?

READ MORE AT http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/the_gop_establishment_is_pretending_to_warm_to_donald_trump.html