Wednesday, November 27, 2013

OBAMA PICKS THE WINNERS : giving unions 'special treatment' with exemption from ObamaCare fee

Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!

WHY YOU SHOULD LOBBY CONGRESS Citizens may feel it is a waste of time to contact elected leaders, because their minds are made up already. But on most issues, legislators try hard to determine the desires and leanings of their constituency before they vote. Politicians worry about being re-elected, and know that the happier their constituency, the more likely their own re-election.
Contact Your Members Of Congress On This Issue! Tell your members Of Congress That Its Time To End The Illegal Actions Of The Obama Admin & Other Government Agencies!

To contact Congress On this issue click on your state link to find & contact your members of Congress
US Government
US Senate
US House
State/Federal Candidates
Members of Congress
Bills & Resolutions

Bills & Resolutions
Voting Records
National Weather
Maps
Report Illegals & Employers
Military

CONTACT THE
 PRESIDENT
CONTACT THE VICE 
PRESIDENT
SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
SENATE MINORITY LEADER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER



The Obama administration is being accused of giving labor groups "special treatment under the law" after formally proposing a change that could exempt union health plans from a pesky ObamaCare fee. 
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., who flagged the obscure rule change after it was filed in the Federal Register (see page 70), blasted the exemption as "crony capitalism at its worst." 
"Unions are now experiencing the ugly reality of this law, and they want out," he said in a statement. 
Indeed, the AFL-CIO has fought against what is known as the "reinsurance fee" in the Affordable Care Act. The temporary fee would kick in next year and is meant to raise $25 billion over three years, to help pay for the cost of people with pre-existing conditions signing up for coverage through the ObamaCare exchanges. 
The proposal filed Monday would exempt certain self-insured plans -- those that do not use a third-party administrator for core functions -- for 2015 and 2016. 
Republicans charge this is aimed at unions' so-called Taft-Hartley plans, though union officials had downplayed the change and suggested some of their plans wouldn't be eligible anyway. 
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said earlier this month -- when the administration first telegraphed that it might craft the exemption -- that the change does not single out the union insurance policies, according to The Associated Press. 
A Health and Human Services official also disputed the claim that this is directed at unions. 
"This definition would exempt any self-insured group health plan that does not use a third party administrator for claims processing or enrollment, not only union plans," the official told FoxNews.com, adding they are proposing the change to better "align" the definition with the law. "The phrase 'self-insured, self-administered plans' is not synonymous with multiemployer plans, or Taft-Hartley plans." 
But Republicans say the change is clearly aimed at unions, particularly after labor leaders made a high-profile push to extract some relief from the health care law. 
Trumka and other labor leaders met with President Obama and Vice President Biden at the White House in September, as part of a bid to win additional health care subsidies for their workers. The administration determined it could not give them any more subsidies, but later made clear it would look at providing relief from the so-called reinsurance fee. 
The fee would start at $63 per person next year, but then drop to a bit more than $40 per person in 2015. It would drop again the following year. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

A9

The Teaparty Lobby
"Join Your State Group Today"

We Ask For Your Support In Defeating The liberal , Socialist Democrats In 2014 ! Join The Fight ! Join Or Start A Teaparty Group !
Visit & Join One Or All Of Our Facebook State Groups, Post On Our Groups Wall !
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California
Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia
Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey
New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio
Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont
Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Dist. of Columbia